Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
GAJNA & OTHERS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J .
1. Both the appeals, as noticed above, are being disposed of by this common judgment, having arisen out of the impugned award dated 20.09.2011 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’), whereby the claimants were awarded compensation to tune of Rs.7,28,560/- along with interest @7.5% per annum and the Insurance company was held liable to pay the compensation to the claimants.
2. The appeal, i.e. FAO-6721-2011, has been preferred by the appellant- Insurance Company against the award dated 20.09.2011 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala, whereby the claim petition filed by the respondent No.1 to 6/claimants was allowed and the appellant-Insurance company was held liable to pay the compensation to respondent No.1 to 6/claimants to the tune of Rs.7,28,560/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum.
3. The appeal, i.e. FAO-1124-2013, has been preferred by the appellants/claimants against the Award dated 20.09.2011 passed by the learned Tribunal in the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
The court established that the compensation for death in a motor accident must accurately reflect the deceased's potential future income, utilizing the appropriate multiplier based on age rather than....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
