Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
PARAMJIT KAUR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
PARTAP SINGH AND ORS – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J .
1. Both the appeals, as noticed above, are being disposed of by this common judgment, having arisen out of the impugned award dated 03.05.2017 passed by the learned Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal, Fatehabad, whereby the claimants were awarded compensation to tune of Rs.14,20,000/- along with interest @7.5% per annum and the Insurance company was held liable to pay the compensation to the claimants.
2. The appeal, i.e. FAO-5944-2017, has been preferred by the appellant- Insurance Company against the Award dated 03.05.2017 passed by the learned Tribunal in the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, whereby the claim petition filed by the respondent No.1 and 2/claimants was allowed and the appellant-Insurance company was held liable to pay the compensation to respondent No.1 and 2/claimants to the tune of Rs.14,20,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum.
3. The appeal, i.e. FAO-5910-2017, has been preferred by the appellant/claimant against the Award dated 03.05.2017 passed by the learned Tribunal in the claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, for enhancement of compensation, granted to the appellant/c
In motor accident claims, the standard of proof is the preponderance of probability. Income assessment should rely on the latest statutory tax returns, and compensation must include the value of mana....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
