SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(P&H) 1433

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJ
State Of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Krishan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Abhinash Jain, D.A.G., Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

HARKESH MANUJA, J. 

[1]. Vide this common order, the present appeals bearing RFA Nos.1881, 1882, 1883, 1884, 1885, 1886, 1887, 1888, 1889, 1890, 1891, 1892, 1893, 1894, 1895, 1896, 1897, 2259 and 3200 of 2002 (O&M) are being decided as all these appeals have arisen out of common acquisition and involve identical facts and questions of law. For the sake of brevity, facts are being taken from RFA No.1881 of 2002.

[2]. By way of present appeal, challenge has been laid to an Award dated 26.02.2002 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Hisar (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Reference Court’).

[3]. Briefly stating, in the present case(s), 4.03 acres of land, which on demarcation was later found 3.94 acres, situated within the revenue estate of village Lohari Ragho, Tehsil Narnaund, District Hisar, was acquired vide Notifications dated 30.12.1996 and 19.08.1997 issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the ‘1894 Act’) respectively, for the public purpose, namely “for construction of missing link road between Datta Lohari and Sisai Lohari road”. Award under Section 11 of the 1894 Act was passed by the Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top