SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(P&H) 2248

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
HARKESH MANUJA
Ranbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B.S. Rathee
For the Respondent: Abhinash Jain

JUDGMENT :

HARKESH MANUJA, J.

1. Vide this common order, both the aforementioned Regular First Appeals, are being decided as the same have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving identical facts and question of law. For the sake of brevity, facts are being taken from RFA No.3868 of 2007.

2. By way of present appeal(s), challenge has been laid to the Award dated 20.07.2007 passed by the learned Addl. District Judge, Panipat (hereinafter to be referred as the ‘Reference Court’).

3. Briefly stating, in the present case(s), total land measuring 13 Bighas 09 Biswas, situated within the revenue estate of village Didwari, Hadbast No.39 Tehsil Israna, District Panipat came to be acquired vide Notifications dated 04.05.2001 and 22.01.2002 issued under Sections 4 & 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short the ‘1894 Act’) respectively for the public purpose, namely “for the construction of New Balana Minor from RD.0 to 17200 tail off-taking at RD 15350-L, Israna Disty. by Irrigation Department’. Award under Section 11 of the 1894 Act was passed by the Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘the LAC’) on 15.01.2003, whereby market value of the acquired land was assessed @ Rs.2,20,000

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top