SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 210

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MALKIT RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

NAMIT KUMAR, J.

1. Instant writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside order dated 09.12.2025 (Annexure P-10) as well as the order dated 18.04.2024 (Annexure P-6), passed by respondent No.2, whereby application/representation to allow the petitioner to withdraw the voluntary retirement and to rejoin as per letter/representation dated 14.02.2024 (Annexure P-4), has been rejected.

2. Brief facts of the case, as have been pleaded in the petition, are that the petitioner was working as Multipurpose Health Supervisor (Male) at Primary Health Centre (PHC), Khatkar Kalan under PHC Sujjon, District Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar. Due to illness of his mother and certain other pressing family circumstances, petitioner applied for leave, which was not sanctioned. Thereafter, the petitioner submitted an application dated 30.10.2023 (Annexure P-1), seeking voluntary retirement by giving an advance notice of 90 days, as prescribed under the relevant rules. Despite lapse of 38 days, the said application for voluntary retirement of the petitioner was not accepted by the respondents. Subsequently, petitioner submitted another application d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top