Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, RAMESH KUMARI
Lovepreet Singh alias Ravi – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAMESH KUMARI, J.
In the instant appeal, the appellant-Lovepreet Singh @ Ravi (hereinafter referred to as an accused) has prayed for grant of regular bail in RC No. 10/2021/NIA/DLI dated 10.06.2021 arising out of FIR No. 38 dated 22.04.2021 under Sections 120-B, 115, 170, 201, 385, 386, 387 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code; under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 25(1A), 25(6), 25(7) and 29 of the Arms Act; and Section 17,18, 18-B, 20, 21 and 23 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, registered at Police Station Mehna, District Moga.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that accused Arshdeep Singh alias Arsh alias Prabh (A-6), presently in Surrey, Canada alongwith present appellant-accused Lovepreet Singh alias Ravi and other co-accused persons had formed a gang for threatening and extorting money from people under the directions of Hardeep Singh Nijjar (A-7), Chief of Khalistan Tiger Force (KTF). In pursuance of above criminal conspiracy, accused Lovepreet Singh alias Ravi (A-1), Ram Singh alias Sona (A-2), Kamaljeet Sharma alias Kamal (A-3) committed targeted killings of prominent people and persons of other fai
(1) Bail application – Exercise of general power to grant bail under UAP Act is severely restrictive in scope – In dealing with bail applications under UAP Act, courts are merely examining if there i....
The right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is imperative, and prolonged incarceration without the likelihood of a timely trial may warrant the grant of bail.
The completion of investigation and prolonged judicial custody are significant factors in determining the entitlement to bail under UAPA. The court emphasized the mandatory requirements under Section....
The main legal point established is that the grant of bail under UAPA requires a prima facie view of the accused's involvement, balancing of various factors, and imposition of stringent conditions to....
The court established that for offenses under the UA(P) Act, mere association with a terrorist organization is insufficient for conviction; intent to further the organization's activities must be pro....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
