SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3540

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
NIDHI GUPTA
Harjinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bikramjit Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Ranjit Saini

JUDGMENT :

NIDHI GUPTA, J.

CM-11678-C-2023

1. Prayer in this application filed under Section 151 CPC is for condonation of delay of 65 days in refiling the accompanying appeal.

2. Heard.

3. For the reasons mentioned in the application which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant/appellant No.2, the same is allowed and delay of 65 days in refiling the appeal is condoned.

RSA-3265-2023 (O&M)

1. Defendants are in Second Appeal against the concurrent judgments and decrees of the ld. District Courts; whereby suit filed by the plaintiffs/respondents herein, seeking specific performance of Agreement to Sell dated 16.11.2011, has been decreed for specific performance of Agreement to Sell, by both the District Courts.

2. Brief facts of the case as pleaded in the plaint are that, that as per the Jamabandi for the year 2008-2009, defendants are owners of the suit property measuring 2K as described in the plaint. It was stated that defendants entered into Agreement to Sell dated 16.11.2011 for the land measuring 2K in favour of the plaintiff for a total sale consideration of Rs.10 lacs. Defendants had received Rs.7 lacs by way of earnest money. Date of execution of Sale Deed was decided on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top