SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1285

PANKAJ JAIN
Madan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Kaur – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

Pankal Jain, J.

CM-3822-C-2020 & CM-3823-C-2020

These applications have been filed seeking condonation of delay of 934 days in re-filing and 32 days in filing the present appeal.

For the reasons recorded, the application, this Court is satisfied that the applicant-appellant has shown sufficient cause to condone the delay in re-filing/filing the appeal.

Applications are allowed. Delay in re-filing and filing the appeal is condoned.

Main Case

1. Plaintiff is in second appeal. For convenience parties hereinafter are referred to by their original position in the suit i.e. the appellant as plaintiff and respondent as defendant.

2. Plaintiff filed suit seeking decree of specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.04.2010. The pleaded case of the plaintiff was that agreement to sell was executed by defendant in her favour on 01.04.2010 after receiving earnest money of Rs.1.00 Lac. As per the agreed terms sale deed was to be executed on or before 30.11.2010 on payment of balance sale consideration. The total sale consideration was agreed to be Rs.4.00 lacs. Plaintiff in order to prove his case examined Lakhvir Singh and Bhim Sain, two attesting witnesses as PW1 and PW2 resp

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top