Isab vs State of Haryana - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 432

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Isab – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Nafees Ahmed, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG,
For the Complainant :Mr. Munfaid Khan, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.343 dated 19.12.2025 registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, at Police Station Central Faridabad, District Faridabad.

2. Brief facts as per the prosecution case are that the petitioner in connivance with other co-accused cheated the complainant for an amount of Rs.28 lakhs, on the pretext of selling land on the basis of forged agreement to sell. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further argued that the present FIR has been lodged after an unexplained delay of one year and five months, casting serious doubt on the prosecution story. He argued that only general and vague allegations have been levelled against the petitioner in the FIR. He further argued that name of the present petitioner has been dragged in the FIR solely on the ground that he was acting as a witness to the alleged agreement to sell. He argued that neither the petitioner was any beneficiary to the alleged a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document