SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 261

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAVINDER KAUR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.

1. Present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue with General Provident Fund Scheme and to grant him pensionary benefits as applicable to the employees recruited prior to 01.01.2004 along with all the consequential benefits. It is further prayed to direct the respondents to count the entire service rendered by the petitioner on contract basis before regularization for the purpose of qualifying service for pension and other retiral benefits in view of Rule 2(J) of Punjab Municipal Employees Pension and General Provident Fund Rules, 1994 (for short ‘1994 Rules’).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk on contract basis in Municipal Council, Dera Bassi vide appointment letter dated 22.04.1999 and she joined on 27.04.1999. In the year 2011, services of the petitioner were regularized and her initial appointment in the year 1999 does not make her a new entrant after cut off date. He relies upon a judgment passed by the Division Bench

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top