IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Bhagwati – Appellant
Versus
Hari Dutt Sharma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.
The appeal pertains to the year 2013. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
Mr. Parit Aggarwal, Advocate, who is present in Court, is appointed as a Legal Aid Counsel, to assist this Court, on behalf of the appellants.
High Court Legal Services Committee to pay fee to learned counsel, as per Rules.
CM-19703-CII-2013.
Prayer in the present application preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is for condonation of 146 days’ delay in filing the appeal.
Heard.
For the reasons given in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of appellant No.2, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions and the delay of 146 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
FAO-4657-2013
The instant appeal has been instituted by the claimants against the award dated 15.12.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rewari (for short `the MACT’), whereby the claim petition filed by the claimants was dismissed. 2. The facts, as emanating from the paper book, are that a claim petition was instituted under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short ‘the MV Act’), by the claimants (parents of deceased Mukesh Kumar). It was ave
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.