IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
AMARJIT KAUR ETC. – Appellant
Versus
BHUPINDER SINGH ETC. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUDEEPTI SHARMA J.
1. The present appeal has been preferred against the award dated 12.03.2009 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala in the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Tribunal’) for enhancement of compensation granted to the claimants to the tune of Rs.6,51,000/- along with interest @ 7.5% per annum, on account of death of Baldev Singh in a Motor Vehicular Accident, occurred on 13.11.2006.
2. As sole issue for determination in the present appeal is confined to quantum of compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal, a detailed narration of the facts of the case is not required to be reproduced here for the sake of brevity.
SUBMISSIONS OF LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PARTIES
3. The learned counsel for the claimants-appellants contends that the amount assessed by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side and deserves to be enhanced. Therefore, he prays that the present appeal be allowed and amount of compensation be enhanced as per latest law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent No.3, however, vehemently argues that the award has rightly been passed and the amount of compensation, as assess
In motor accident claims, salary certificates should be accepted as evidence of income if testimony is unshaken. Compensation must be calculated by applying the correct multiplier, adding future pros....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.