SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(P&H) 363

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KISHAN CHAND – Appellant
Versus
BHARTO – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

MANDEEP PANNU, J.

1. This Regular Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellants legal representatives of original defendant No.1 Krishan Chand, against the judgment and decree dated 09.04.1993 passed by the Court of Additional District Judge, Sonepat, whereby the learned First Appellate Court set aside the judgment and decree dated 18.01.1989 passed by the Court of Sub Judge, Sonepat, and decreed the suit of the plaintiff-respondent Smt. Bharto for declaration, thereby declaring the decree dated 02.01.1981 in Civil Suit No. 691/1980 as well as the subsequent sale deed dated 11.01.1988 as illegal, void and not binding on the rights of the plaintiff.

Brief Facts

2. The case of the plaintiff, as set up in the plaint and amended plaint, is that defendant No.2 Udmi was the owner in possession of agricultural land measuring 20 Kanals 10 Marlas, being ½ share in Khewat No. 735/697, Khatoni No. 1399/1333, Rect. & Killa No. 105, 17/2, 18, 22, 23, 1-0,8-2, 3-8, 8-0, situated in the revenue estate of village Ganaur, Tehsil Ganaur, District Sonepat. The remaining ¼ share of land measuring 76 Kanals 9 marlas was also owned and possessed by defendant No.2. The land is ancestral and h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top