SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(P&H) 2975

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
KULDEEP TIWARI, J.
Surinder Mohan And Another - Petitioners 
Versus
State of Punjab And Others – Respondents
CWP-2533 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-1067 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-14501 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-14784 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-2984 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-400 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-477 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-721 of 2017 (O&M), CWP-8491 of 2017 (O&M) 
Decided On : 08-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Ms. Anu Chatrath, Sr. Additional A.G., Punjab, assisted by Dr. Dharminder S. Lamba, Addl. A.G., Punjab, Ms. Ekjot Sandhu, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

KULDEEP TIWARI, J.

1. All these writ petitions are amenable for being decided through a common verdict on account of theirs inhering a common question of law and fact. In essence, the petitioners are aggrieved by the respondents’ decision declaring them ineligible for appointment to the post of Intelligence Assistant (in the respective ranks of Constable and Sub-Inspector) on the ground of non-fulfilment of the prescribed educational qualifications.

2. Concisely and compendiously, the respondent(s)-department, vide Advertisement No.1/2016 dated 01.09.2016 and Advertisement No.2/2016 dated 08.09.2016, invited online applications for direct recruitment to fill up vacancies of male and female Intelligence Assistants and Intelligence Officers, in the respective ranks of Constable and Sub- Inspector, in the Intelligence Wing of Punjab Police. The petitioners applied within the stipulated period and successfully cleared the physical efficiency test, whereafter they were permitted to appear in the written examination. However, upon scrutiny of documents by a duly constituted Committee, the petitioners were found ineligible on account of non-fulfilment of the prescribed educational qualifications.

3. Since the fulcrum of the dispute consists of the educational qualifications prescribed in the respective advertisements (supra), it is deemed imperative, at the outset, to advert to and examine the prescribed educational qualifications, which are reproduced hereinafter:-

ADVT. NO.: 1/2016

C. EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:

The minimum educational qualification for direct recruitment as Intelligence Assistants (in rank of Constables) shall be as defined in Appendix 'B' (Sr. No. 04) of Punjab Intelligence Cadre (Group 'C') Service Rules, 2015 as amended by the Punjab Intelligence Cadre (Group 'C') Service (First Amendment) Rules, 2016:

(a) Should be a graduate from a recognized university or institution, as the case may be, provided that such candidate should also possess an ‘O’ Level Certificate of Information Technology from Department for Electronics Accreditation of Computer Course (DOEACC) or National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology (NIELIT) or its equivalent institution recognized by the Government of India or any State Government;

OR

(b) B.Sc/B.Tech./BE in Information Technology or Computer Science or Information Systems or B.C.A or Post Graduate Diploma in Computer Applications from a recognized university or institution, as the case maybe.”

“ADVT. NO.: 2/2016

C. EDUCATIONAL QUALIFICATIONS:

The minimum educational qualification for direct recruitment as intelligence Officers (in the rank of Sub- Inspectors) shall be as defined in Appendix 'B' (Sr. No. 01) of Punjab Intelligence Cadre (Group 'C') Service Rules, 2015 as amended by the Punjab Intelligence Cadre (Group 'C') Service (First Amendment) Rules, 2016:

(a) Should be a graduate from a recognized university or institution, as the case may be, provided that such candidate should also possess an ‘O’ Level Certificate of Information Technology from Department for Electronics Accreditation of Computer Course (DOEACC) or National Institute of Electronics and Information Technology (NIELIT) or its equivalent institution recognized by the Government of India or any State Government;

OR

(b) B.Sc/B.Tech./BE in Information Technology or Computer Science or Information Systems or B.C.A or Post Graduate Diploma in Computer Applications from a recognized university or institution, as the case maybe.”

4. It has consistently been the case of the petitioners that they possess degrees of B.Sc. with Computer Science or qualifications higher than the ‘O’ Level Certificate of Information Technology from Department for Electronics Accreditation of Computer Course (hereinafter referred to as the “DOEACC”). Conversely, the respondents maintain that the petitioners do not possess the requisite qualifications, as prescribed, and that their candidature was, therefore, rightly rejected.

COLLECTI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top