Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Ram Pal – Appellant
Versus
Ranbir – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.
1. This petition is preferred under Section 227 of the Constitution of India, invoking the supervisory and revisional jurisdiction of this Court, challenging the legality, propriety, and correctness of the order dated 12.08.2025 (Annexure P-5). By the said order, the learned Court dismissed the appeal filed against the earlier order dated 16.02.2023, whereby the petitioner’s application for restoration of the civil suit was rejected. The petitioner, aggrieved by the manifest errors apparent on the face of the record, seeks the exercise of this Court’s supervisory and revisional powers to prevent miscarriage of justice and to safeguard the petitioner’s fundamental rights and legal entitlements. It is submitted that the impugned order suffers from non-application of mind, procedural irregularity, and legal infirmity, thereby compelling intervention of this Court in the exercise of its constitutional and judicial oversight.
2. The petitioner instituted a civil suit seeking possession of the subject property. During the pendency of the proceedings, while the plaintiff’s evidence remained unrecorded, the plaintiff failed to appear, resulting in dismissal of
A revision under Article 227 does not lie against the refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal when no jurisdictional error is established; timely filing of appeals is essential.
Diligence and urgency are crucial in pursuing legal remedies, and the absence of satisfactory explanation and good faith may lead to the dismissal of an application for condonation of delay.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
