Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIKRAM AGGARWAL
Pt. Jot Ram (deceased) through his legal representatives – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar Goyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J.
CM-564-CII-2026
Prayer in the present application preferred under Section 151 CPC is for placing on record additional documents as Annexures P-7 to P-11.
Heard.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed subject to all just exceptions. Additional documents are taken on record as Annexures P-7 to P-11.
Registry to tag the said documents at appropriate place in the case file.
CR-214- 2026 (O&M)
1. The instant revision petition, preferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is a classic example of misuse and abuse of the legal process by an unscrupulous tenant.
2. The petitioners, who are the legal representatives of one Pt. Jot Ram, assail the order dated 05.01.2026, passed by the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.), Sirsa, vide which fresh warrants of possession have been ordered to be issued for delivery of possession of the demised premises.
3. The facts, as emanating from the revision petition, are that on 19.01.1991, respondent No.1 (Anil Kumar Goyal) instituted an eviction petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 (for short, ‘the Rent Act’), seeking eviction of the predecessor-i
A revision petition becomes infructuous when possession of the tenanted premises has been restored to the landlord, limiting the High Court's role to procedural compliance.
A revision petition becomes infructuous when possession of the tenanted premises has been restored to the landlord, limiting the High Court's role to procedural compliance.
The admission made by the tenants in their written statement can be used as the best evidence against them, and the court upheld the eviction based on the requirement of the premises for personal use....
Once an issue has been adjudicated in court, it cannot be re-litigated in later proceedings, maintaining the authority of previous judgments on the same matter.
Amendments should not fundamentally change the nature of the case and must be bona fide.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the rental agreement and the consequences of non-payment of rent under the Tamil Nadu Buildings [Lease and Rent Control] Act, 1960.
The main legal point established is that valid reasons for failing to contest proceedings, such as the petitioner's purchase under the SARFAESI Act, can influence the court to set aside orders and di....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
