Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
DEEPAK GUPTA
Lalu Ram @ Lallu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Anisha Modi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK GUPTA, J.
This order shall dispose of two revision petitions mentioned in the title, as both arise out of similarly worded orders passed by the learned Rent Controller, Ludhiana and the learned Appellate Authority, Ludhiana, in two separate ejectment petitions concerning the same premises.
2. In both matters, the petitioner before the Rent Controller is the same landlady, namely Smt. Anisha Modi (respondent herein), whereas the respondents before the Rent Controller, namely, Lalu Ram @ Lallu Ram and Raj Kumar (petitioners herein), are tenants occupying two separate rooms in the same property.
3. For the sake of convenience, facts are being taken from CR No.4158 of 2025, titled “Lalu Ram @ Lallu Ram versus Anisha Modi”. The parties shall hereina5er be referred to as the landlady and the tenant, respectively, to avoid any confusion regarding their status.
4. Case of the Landlady : According to the landlady Smt. Anisha Modi, she is the owner of a property measuring 362 square yards, bearing No. 136-J, Municipal Corporation No. 877/2, falling in Khasra No.27//17, commonly known as Moti Nagar, situated at Sherpur Kalan near Gajja Jain Colony, Ludhiana, by dint of registered
The tenant's conduct amounted to misuse, and failure to pay provisional rent led to the orders of eviction being upheld.
Tenants denying landlord-tenant relationship cannot seek rent assessment; landlady's bona fide need for eviction upheld.
A tenant cannot amend their written statement to contradict a prior denial of landlord-tenant relationship, as this would alter the fundamental nature of the case.
The court upheld the provisional rent assessment and eviction order, emphasizing the tenant's obligation to comply with rent orders to avoid eviction.
The court upheld the provisional rent assessment but set aside the requirement for the tenant to deposit arrears, emphasizing the need for evidence in disputes over rent payments.
Court confirms that a tenant's good faith intent to pay addresses eviction liability if the Rent Controller fails to accurately assess due rent, emphasizing fair enforcement of the law.
The court emphasized the importance of evidence and the need for arguments to be based on the written statement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
