Back
ARCHANA PURI
Ram Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Rekha Tyagi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Archana Puri, J.
These are two revision petitions filed to challenge the concurrent findings of learned Rent Controller and Appellate Authority, passed in two ejectment petitions, thereby, ordering and affirming, eviction of the petitioners Ram Gopal and Som Nath, from two adjoining shops.
2. There are identical facts in both the petitions. As such, the facts, germane to be noticed, are as follows:-
3. Besides the aforesaid ground, qua both the shops, the landlady also took the ground of requirement of the shop for bonafide personal use to run boutique, as she does not have an other property in her possession, which is more suitable place for the boutique purposes.
4. In the petitions, it was asserted that the shops in question were in possession of the re
Tenants denying landlord-tenant relationship cannot seek rent assessment; landlady's bona fide need for eviction upheld.
The landlord's bonafide requirement for commercial use of residential property is valid if tenants are already using it commercially, and previous dismissals do not bar new petitions based on new evi....
The landlord's bona fide requirement for personal use, once established, justifies eviction, while the tenant must prove valid reasons for non-occupation.
The requirement of a landlord for eviction under the Delhi Rent Control Act is presumed bona fide unless convincingly disputed; mere allegations of alternative accommodation are insufficient without ....
The burden of proof lies on the landlord to establish a genuine and bona fide requirement for possession of the premises, and the tenant must prima facie make out a case that disentitles the landlord....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
