IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SUMEET GOEL
Anchal Mittal – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUMEET GOEL, J.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS 2023, primarily seeking quashing of the order dated 05.01.2026 (Annexure P- 9) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri vide which the petitioners were ordered to be summoned through non-bailable warrants in case pertaining to FIR No.0060 dated 17.10.2023 under Sections 420, 419, IPC registered at Police Station Cyber Crime, Yamuna Nagar.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that earlier the petitioners were released on bail by the competent Court and were regularly appearing before the concerned Court. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has further submitted that since petitioner No.1 was suffering from acute abdominal pain and petitioner No.2 was suffering from viral infection, they could not appear before the concerned Court on the date fixed and moved applications for exemption from personal appearance. However, , the learned trial Court declined the applications and proceeded to cancel the petitioners bail and issued non-bailable warrants for their arrest without affording an adequate opportunity to explain his non-appearance. Learned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.