SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(P&H) 1138

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
(O&M)ISHWAR – Appellant
Versus
SITA RAM – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.

1. The appellant/plaintiff, feeling deeply aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 04.12.1991 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sonepat whereby the well-reasoned and duly considered judgment and decree dated 03.08.1989 rendered by the learned Sub-Judge IInd Class, Sonepat, was unjustifiably reversed most respectfully invoke the appellate jurisdiction of this Court by way of the present Regular Second Appeal (for short, “RSA”).

1.1. It is respectfully submitted that the impugned judgment and decree stand vitiated by patent perversity, grave misdirection in law, and a demonstrably erroneous appreciation of the evidentiary material on record. The learned First Appellate Court failed to apply the correct legal principles governing appreciation of evidence, misread material documents, and proceeded on assumptions wholly unsupported by the record, thereby causing a substantial miscarriage of justice.

1.2. The appellant further submit that the findings recorded by the learned Trial Court were based on a meticulous examination of the oral and documentary evidence, and that the decree passed therein was lawful, just, and in strict conformity wi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top