IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Sat Narain – Appellant
Versus
K.V. Multi Healthplex Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J.
1. This consolidated Judgment governs the adjudication of the above-captioned Regular Second Appeals (for short to be referred as “RSAs”), each arising from an identical factual and legal matrix. Given the commonality of parties, the coextensive nature of the impugned judgments and decrees, and the consent of learned counsel for joint consideration, these appeals are being disposed of collectively in the interest of judicial economy, uniformity in legal interpretation, and procedural efficiency.
2. At the instance of learned counsel for the parties in both RSAs, the factual matrix for the purposes of this consolidated order has been carefully extracted from the records of both appeals, as it presents the most complete, accurate, and coherent account of the material facts. While the issues in each appeal may differ, the facts so delineated are adopted collectively to constitute the representative factual foundation for the adjudication of the present matters, ensuring a comprehensive and uniform basis for determination.
3. The appellants/defendants in the above-captioned RSAs have filed the present appeals assailing the impugned judgments and decrees re
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a party seeking leave to file second appeal for challenging a decree must show that they are bonafide purchasers without notice and have taken....
The doctrine of res judicata between co-defendants must be applied with care and caution, and the findings in a previous suit can operate as res judicata between co-defendants if certain conditions a....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.