SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 3563

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
VIRINDER AGGARWAL
Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Kharga Ram – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

VIRINDER AGGARWAL, J

1. By way of the present Regular Second Appeal (hereinafter referred to as “RSA”) the appellant–defendant has approached this Court, seeking to impugn and set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.04.2023 rendered by the learned Additional District Judge, Narnaul, whereby the judgment and decree dated 21.2.2016 passed by the learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Kanina was affirmed. The learned trial Court had decreed the suit filed by the respondents–plaintiff, directing possession of the suit property by way of partition. The appellant has challenged the concurrent findings of the Courts below on the grounds that the same are manifestly erroneous, legally unsustainable, and bereft of evidentiary support.

2. On a meticulous consideration of the factual matrix as articulated in the plaint, the case of the plaintiff stands delineated with precise clarity, and may be succinctly summarized as follows:-

“The brief facts of the present suit, as set forth by the plaintiffs, are as follows: The immovable property in dispute, measuring 4 kanal 18 marlas, bearing Killa No. 4//14/2 (2-0) Gair Mumkin Khadda and Khasra No. 61/1 (2-18) Gair Mumkin Abad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top