SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Sikk) 105

J. K. MAHESHWARI
Ram Bahadur Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. B.K. Gupta, Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. Thinlay Dorjee Bhutia, Govt. Advocate, for the Respondents

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction for commanding respondent no.2 to pay the subsistence allowance from the month of June, 2019 to till date to the petitioner with a further prayer to issue any appropriate writ, order or direction.

The facts leading to decide the controversy and relief as prayed are relevant, wherein the petitioner was placed on suspension on 27.08.2001 on account of registration of Criminal case against him under Section 420 , 467, 468 and 471 of INDIAN PENAL CODE . In a criminal trial he was convicted vide judgment dated 18.11.2005 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, East Sikkim. In Appeal before the Session Court the said order was affirmed and on filing the Revision, the High Court vide order dated 07.06.2013 modified only the sentence part, confirming the findings to prove charge. A Special Leave Petition was also preferred before the Hon’ble Supreme Court CRLMP No.23558- 23559/2014 which was dismissed on 05.12.2014.

Thereafter, the Department has decided to take action as per the provision of Rule 7 of the Sikkim Government Service (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985. It is relevant to note that the petitioner attained the age of su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top