Back
BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Kuber Raj Rai – Appellant
Versus
Saran Thapa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background establishes loan details. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. defendants' denial of loan and allegations of fraud. (Para 3) |
| 3. trial court's conclusions on loan validity. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. arguments regarding additional evidence and rulings. (Para 6 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT
Bhaskar Raj Pradhan, J. - This is a regular first appeal against the judgment and decree, both dated 28.02.2019, passed by the learned District Judge, Special Division-I, Sikkim at Gangtok (the learned District Judge), whereby the Money Suit No. 165 of 2017 (the Money Suit) filed by Kuber Raj Rai, the appellant (plaintiff) was dismissed. The Money Suit was filed on 26.10.2017 against the two respondents, i.e., Saran Thapa (defendant no.1) and Ranjit Rai (defendant no.2). For clarity, they shall be referred to as plaintiff and defendants.
2. In the plaint, the plaintiff pleaded that in connection with a civil work, i.e., “Mastic Alphabet and Repairing of Road Surface, Drain, etc., in between Rangpo - Ranipool (018.500 kms) under 13th Finance Commission during 2013-2014 of Government of India, Office of the Central Public Work Department, Matigara
The plaintiff failed to establish any loan agreement with the defendants, rendering the claim invalid and the court held the documentation as fabricated and misleading.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that admissions by the parties and the authenticity of documents play a crucial role in determining liability for loan repayment.
A party seeking judgment on admission must demonstrate clear and unequivocal admissions, and failure to establish a prima facie case precludes injunction relief.
A friendly loan agreement is enforceable even if not attested or stamped, provided it can be proven that both parties understood and accepted the terms, distinguishing it from regulated moneylending ....
A party seeking judgment on admission must demonstrate unequivocal admissions; failure to establish a prima facie case negates the possibility of granting an injunction.
Point of Law; Loan – Statement to police – Admission – Admissibility –Held, admission if to be used against the maker, in a civil suit, the said admission has to be tested whether given out of free w....
The lack of privity of contract and failure to establish a cause of action were central to the court's decision.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
