MARLI VANKUNG
Dothuama Sailo S/o Liankamlova Dinthar Veng, Lunglei – Appellant
Versus
Mizoram Rural Bank, Lunglei Branch represented by Branch Manager – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Mr. L.H. Lianhrima, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. T. Lalnunsiama, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. Respondent no.2 is the proforma respondent.
2. This is an appeal for setting aside the Judgment and order and Decree passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Lunglei in Civil Suit No.22/2010 dated 16.03.2016.
3. The brief facts leading to the filing of the present appeal is that the defendant no.1/appellant approached the plaintiff/respondent no.1 by submitting his application for Small Scale Composite Term Loan on 11.03.2002 for a sum of Rs. 9,50,000/-for his business of stone works. As a result, the defendant no.1/appellant was granted a loan of Rs. 9,50,000/-on 01-03-2004 under the terms and conditions laid down therein. The defendant no.1/appellant mortgaged his LSC No. 89 of 1974 for the purpose of bringing equitable mortgage of the loan and it was taken as security against the said loan amount. .Further, the defendant no. 2/respondent no.2 stood as guarantor and executed the Guarantee Agreement in favour of the defendant no.1/appellant on the same date itself. The cause of action arose when the defendant no.1/appellant failed
Legal Heirs Parbati Devi Malpani & Ors. Vs. Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors.
Sanglura Sailo (Now Dead) Vs. C. Lalrampari reported in 2013 (2) GauLT 274
State Of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Navir Singh & Anr reported in (2014) 1 SCC 105
Sayed Muhammed Mashur Kunchi Koyal Thangal Vs. Badagara Jumayath Palli Dharas
Sait Tarajee Khimchand and Others Vs. Yelamarti Satyam and Others reported in AIR 1971 SC 1865
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.