HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Meenakshi Madan Rai, ACJ.
Chief of The Army Staff & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Secretary, Land Revenue Respondents & Disaster Management Department, Government of Sikkim & Ors. - Respondents
Review Pet. (C) No. 04 of 2021
Decided On : 07-10-2021
JUDGMENT
1. The instant Review Petition has been filed by the Petitioners seeking a review of the Order, dated 14.09.2021, in C.M.C. No.04 of 2021.
2. While urging that the interest rate of 6% reflected in the Order supra sought to be reviewed, be deleted it was contended by the Learned Assistant Solicitor General that the Petitioners were initially granted three months time to pay the compensation awarded to the Respondents No.3 to 23, vide the Final Order dated 19.03.2021 in W.P.(C) No.55 of 2018. On failure to deposit the amount, the Court had ordered that delay would entail deposit with interest at the rate of 6% per annum. On 23.06.2021, in C.M.C. No.01 of 2021, on further time being sought by the Petitioners the Court was pleased to grant further three months to the Petitioners to pay the compensation i.e. till 19.09.2021. That, the extension of time was sans payment of interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the compensation amount. As the Petitioners could not make the payment during the slated period, vide Order dated 14.09.2021, in C.M.C. No.04 of 2021, this Court granted further extension of time for payment. That, in the last Paragraph of the Order, dated 14.09.2021, an interest of 6% is reflected. Since the Respondents raised no objection to the extension of time sought, this Review Petition is preferred praying that the last Paragraph of the Order dated 14.09.2021, wherein interest has been ordered to be paid be deleted.
3. Considered submissions.
4.(i) To understand the matter in its correct perspective, it is necessary to recapitulate that on 19.03.2021, in W.P.(C) No.55 of 2018, a Single Bench of this Court comprising of the then Hon’ble the Chief Justice, had ordered as follows;
“14. Accordingly, this petition is allowed with a direction that the compensation determined by respondents no. 3 and 4 vide letter dated 01.11.2017 shall be deposited by respondents no. 1 and 2 within a period of three months from the date of communication of this Order. Failure to deposit the said amount within the time limit shall entail deposit with interest at the rate of 6 % per annum. It is further directed that on receipt of the said amount of compensation, the respondent nos.3 and 4 shall pay the same to the petitioners, as per law within a further period of one month or may keep in fixed deposit till its disbursement. On failure to pay by respondents No. 3 & 4 within the stipulated time, the interest as per the rates of fixed deposits prevalent on the date of deposit be payable to petitioners.”
(ii) Vide Order dated 23.06.2021 in C.M.C. No.01 of 2021, a Single Bench of this Court again comprising of the then Hon’ble the Chief Justice, had ordered as follows;
“After hearing learned Counsel for both the parties and considering the documents placed on record, this Court deems it appropriate to extend three months more time to the Central Government with the same terms and conditions as mentioned in the original order dated 19-03-2021.
With the aforesaid observation, this petition stands disposed of.”
It may relevantly be explained here that 6% interest was ordered to be paid if compensation was not paid on time and when extension of time for payment was granted, the interest factor remained unchanged.
(iii) On 14.09.2021, C.M.C. No.04 of 2021 was taken up by this Court, on which date, the Learned Assistant Solicitor General filed a Petition seeking further six months time to deposit the compensation amount of Rs.1,89,09,777/- (Rupees one crore, eighty nine lakhs, nine thousand, seven hundred and seventy seven) only, to the Respondents No.3 to 23. After due consideration of the matter, this Court granted time for three months against the six months prayed for by the Petitioners and inter alia ordered as under;
“In view of the lapse of time from March, 2021 and the fact that previously also in C.M.C. No.01 of 2021 three months’ time was afforded to the Petitioners, let the deposit be made by the Petitioners, within three months from today,
The court retains discretion to impose interest on delayed compensation payments despite extensions granted, reinforcing that terms of prior orders remain in force unless explicitly waived.
The power is vested with the Court to consider the rate of interest under the Employee's Compensation Act, and the court's decision on the rate of interest is not subject to review unless there is an....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement to interest for the delay in payment of ex-gratia compensation, based on the principle of awarding interest when there is no specif....
Compensation for railway accidents is determined by the applicable rules at the time of the incident, with interest awarded from the date of accrual, not the date of the accident.
The court established that appellate courts generally must provide reasons for imposing pre-deposit conditions unless justified by exceptional circumstances, reflecting the need to prevent unjust del....
Award of rate of interest @ 12% p.a. reduced to 10% p.a.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.