Back
BISWANATH SOMADDER, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Secretary, Tourism & Civil Aviation Department – Appellant
Versus
Brij Raj Oberoi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of arbitration case initiation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of lease agreement and renewal offer. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 3. state's response and position on lease renewal. (Para 5 , 7) |
| 4. arbitration requirements and implications. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. determination of absence of arbitrable disputes. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. conclusion and dismissal of applications. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
1. Arbitration Appeal No. 02 of 2021 arises out of the impugned order dated 31.05.2021 passed by the learned Commercial Court on an application filed by the respondent (Brij Raj Oberoi) under section 9 (1) (ii) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Arbitration Act). The learned Commercial Court examined, inter-alia, the relevant arbitration clause i.e. 4 (xiii) of the lease agreement dated 09.12.1997 entered between the appellant (the State) and the respondent (Brij Raj Oberoi) leasing out the premises known as “Norkhil Hotel”. It held that arbitrable dispute had arisen between the parties which were to be referred to arbitration and restrained the appellant from disturbing the possession and enjoyment of “Norkhil Hotel” until the commencement of arbitral proceedings.
2. Arbitration Petition
A lease renewal requires an accepted proposal for arbitration; without acceptance, no arbitrable disputes exist, undermining the basis for court intervention.
(1) Dispute arising out of non-renewal of lease is clearly arbitrable – Arbitration clause cannot be rendered otiose by refusal of Respondent State to renew lease.(2) Clauses in a lease deed cannot b....
The court determined that disputes arising from multiple agreements related to a lease are arbitrable, appointing an arbitrator to resolve questions of applicability and obligations under the agreeme....
Oral extensions of lease agreements do not sustain arbitration clauses; such clauses require written documentation to remain valid following the lease's expiration.
The court reaffirmed that the existence of an arbitration agreement is sufficient for appointing an arbitrator, emphasizing minimal judicial interference in arbitration processes.
Appointment of a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in cases of serious breach of lease terms.
The court may appoint an arbitrator even when one party fails to attempt amicable resolution, as specified in the arbitration clause.
The court must appoint an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when there is mutual consent and an existing arbitration agreement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
