Back
THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Bed Prakash Adhikari – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.
1. The victim was a six year old child when she was sexually assaulted by the Appellant, who resided near the government residential quarters of the victim and her family. On 26-04-2023, the FIR Exhibit P4/PW-2, was lodged by PW-2, the Counsellor of the District Child Protection Unit (DCPU), before the concerned Police Station, informing therein that the child aged about ten years had been brought that day to her office, by PW-4 her mother, for counselling. The child PW-1 revealed that in the year 2018-19, when she was playing outside her home, the Appellant called her to him, put her on his lap, facing away from him, caressed her and while she was still on his lap made some movements. He then turned her to face him and she felt a thrust inside her vagina, as he moved, while she was on his lap. The FIR also revealed that according to the victim she had also been sexually assaulted by a person named Lalit Subba in 2019. She did not disclose the incident to anyone but complained of frequent urinary infection. Before lodging the FIR she had participated in Taekwondo in school, upon which she had excess vaginal white discharge and thereafter revealed th
The minimum sentence under the POCSO Act must be imposed without discretion, ensuring adherence to the statutory provisions regarding child sexual offenses.
The Court found that the conviction for aggravated sexual assault under Section 9(m) should be rectified to aggravated penetrative sexual assault under Section 5(m), reflecting the severity of the cr....
Minor discrepancies in victim testimony do not undermine the credibility of sexual assault claims under POCSO; conviction can still be upheld based on consistent evidence.
The court held that insufficient evidence for penetrative assault warrants acquittal under specific POCSO sections, yet convicted the appellant for lesser sexual assault under Section 9(n).
The acquittal of the respondent was upheld due to significant inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and lack of supporting evidence, emphasizing the importance of credible evidence in child sexua....
The prosecution must provide substantial proof in sexual assault cases; the absence of medical evidence undermines the victim's testimony without corroboration.
The reliability of the prosecutrix's testimony and the admissibility of res gestae evidence were central to the court's decision.
The court upheld the conviction for sexual assault on a minor, modifying the life sentence to 10 years based on pre-amendment provisions of the POCSO Act, while confirming the fine imposed.
The court affirmed that prior legal standards apply to convictions, emphasizing the necessity of valid evidence and proper assessment of child witnesses' competency in sexual assault cases.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
