SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Sikk) 10

THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK


Table of Content
1. claims for compensation under motor vehicles act (Para 1)
2. arguments on dependency and compensation calculation (Para 2 , 3)
3. rejection of bachelor status argument (Para 6)
4. dependence of claimants established (Para 7)
5. litigation costs and their disallowance (Para 8)
6. conventional heads of compensation defined (Para 9)
7. total compensation awarded (Para 10)
8. conclusion and order of compensation payment (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 18)

JUDGMENT :

Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.

1. On a Petition filed by the Respondents No.1, 2 and 3 herein, under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, before the Learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Gangtok, Sikkim (hereinafter, the “MACT”), as Claimants, seeking compensation of Rs.4,41,47,970/- (Rupees four crores, forty one lakhs, forty seven thousand, nine hundred and seventy) only, on account of the death of their brother, in a motor vehicle accident, which occurred on the intervening night of 28-05-2022 and 29-05-2022, at Khedum along Chungthang-Lachung Road, Mangan District, Sikkim, the Learned MACT vide the impugned Judgment dated 12-08-2024, in MACT Case No.27 of 2022 (Hasmukh Pannalal Punamiya and Others vs. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top