ANANYA BANDYOPADHYAY
Jyotsna Gope – Appellant
Versus
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.
1. Four legal heirs of deceased Santosh Gope filed an application under Section 166 of the M.V. Act in the Court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Asansol being MAC Case No.40/2016, claiming an award of Rs.5 lakhs along with interest whereby the aforesaid deceased expired due to a road traffic accident on 11.01.2013.
2. The offending vehicle, a truck bearing Registration No. WB-37C-6511 hit the aforesaid deceased approaching in a rash and negligent manner near Majia High School in front of Sanchit Gope’s tea stall on NH-60.
3. Consequently, the victim was declared to have expired at Bankura Medical College and Hospital.
4. Subsequently, based on a written complaint, Mejia P.S. Case No. 20/2014 dated 14.03.2014 under Sections 279/304A of the Indian Penal Code was instituted against the driver of the offending truck as aforesaid.
5. The owner of the offending vehicle did not appear before the Court to contest the MAC case No.40/2016 in the Court of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Judge, 2nd Court, Asansol.
6. The respondent, the New Indian Assurance Company Ltd. contested
Kalpanaraj v. T.N. State Transport Corpn.
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nanu Ram
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Indira Srivastava
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation and Anr. 2009 (6) SCC 121
United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Satinder Kaur Alias Satwinder Kaur and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.