Back
THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI
Satra Services and Solutions Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
National Highways and Infrastructure Development Co. Ltd. (NHIDCL) – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.
1. The Petitioner filed I.A. No.01 of 2025 along with the Writ Petition. The I.A. was an application for stay duly supported by an Affidavit. The prayers in the Writ Petition were as follows;
“……………………………………………………………………………………
(i) Issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other Appropriate Writ, Order or direction thereby quashing the impugned Debarment Notice dated 30.09.2025 {Annexure P-1 (Colly)}, issued by the Respondent No.1;
(ii) Direct the Respondents to restore Status Quo Ante and refrain from giving effect to the Debarment Notice dated 30.09.2025 {Annexure P-1 (Colly)}
(iii) Pass an ad-interim order staying the order impugned Debarment Letter (sic.) dated 30/09/2025 {Annexure P-1 (Colly)}
……………………………………………………………………………………”
2. Before this Court on 13-11-2025, I.A. No.01 of 2025 was taken up for hearing. Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the Petitioner was aggrieved by the Debarment Notice, dated 30-09-2025, issued by the National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL), Respondent No.1 against the Joint Venture (JV) comprising of M/s. Altinok Consulting Engineering Inc. (Respondent No.3) with M/s. Satra Infrastructure Man
The High Court's jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition is contingent upon the authority's location within its territorial limits, not the residence of the aggrieved party.
Participating entities in a joint venture are entitled to individual service of show-cause notices in debarment proceedings. Failure to serve all parties effectively denies them the opportunity to be....
Court clarified the distinction between Certiorari and Mandamus writs, emphasizing the need for correct legal grounds in petitions.
Petitioner after withdrawing a writ petition filed by him in the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without the permission to institute a fresh petition in respect of the same ....
The court highlighted that mere receipt of a rejection letter does not establish territorial jurisdiction if the cancellation decision originates from another jurisdiction.
The court upheld the debarment of the petitioner for failing to submit a performance guarantee on time, affirming the procedural fairness and adherence to the RFP guidelines.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
