SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(All) 1834

SUNIL AMBWANI, M.KATJU
VEEKAY CONNECTORS (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION ltd – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.SINGH, C.S.SINGH, S.P.GUPTA, YASHVANT VARMA

( 1 ) HEARD Sri S. P. Gupta, learned Senior counsel and Shri Yeshwarit verma for the petitioner and Sri Chandra shekhar Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 3 and Sri B. N. Singh, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2, 4, 5 and 6.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has challenged the impugned orders dated 25-3-2004 (Annexure 9 to the petition) and 30-6-2004 (Annexure 14 to the petition ).

( 3 ) SINCE we are deciding the case on a purely legal point in our opinion it is not necessary for us to call for counter affidavit. We have heard learned counsel for the respondents.

( 4 ) THE petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Indian Companies act, and is primarily engaged in the manufacture of Fibre Optic Communication accessories.

( 5 ) ON 13-3-2002 the Bharat Sanchar nigam Limited respondent No. 2 (hereinafter called B. S. N. L.) floated a global tender for the supply of Fibre Distribution Management system (FDMS ). True copy of the tender notice dated 13-3-2002 is Annexure-1 to the writ petition.

( 6 ) UNDER the terms of the tender notice the supply of manufactured items was to be made as per the specifications given by the technical Communication Engineering Centre
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top