SUNIL AMBWANI, M.KATJU
VEEKAY CONNECTORS (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION ltd – Respondent
( 2 ) THE petitioner has challenged the impugned orders dated 25-3-2004 (Annexure 9 to the petition) and 30-6-2004 (Annexure 14 to the petition ).
( 3 ) SINCE we are deciding the case on a purely legal point in our opinion it is not necessary for us to call for counter affidavit. We have heard learned counsel for the respondents.
( 4 ) THE petitioner is a private limited company registered under the Indian Companies act, and is primarily engaged in the manufacture of Fibre Optic Communication accessories.
( 5 ) ON 13-3-2002 the Bharat Sanchar nigam Limited respondent No. 2 (hereinafter called B. S. N. L.) floated a global tender for the supply of Fibre Distribution Management system (FDMS ). True copy of the tender notice dated 13-3-2002 is Annexure-1 to the writ petition.
( 6 ) UNDER the terms of the tender notice the supply of manufactured items was to be made as per the specifications given by the technical Communication Engineering Centre
REFERRED TO : State of Orissa v. Dhaniram Lohar
Raj Kishore Jha v. State of Bihar
Pavanendra Narin Verma v. SGPGI of Medical Sciences
S. N. Mukherjee v. Union of India
Union of Industries v. G. T. C. Industries
State Govt. Houseless Harijan Employees Association v. State of Karnataka
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.