SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 171

N.K.MEHROTRA
URMILA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR NIGAM, LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.K.Seth, UMESHVAR PRASAD


N. K. MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision u/s. 115, c. P. C. against the order dated 22-8-2001 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), mohanlalganj, Lucknow issuing notice on injunction application filed by the applicants in the Regular Suit No. 144 of 2001 (Smt. Urmila Devi and others V. Nagar Nigam, lucknow) by which the learned Civil Judge has found that there is no justification for granting an ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiff and has directed to issue notice fixing 7-9-2001 for disposal of application No. 6-C for ad-interim injunction.

( 2 ) I have heard the learned counsel fpr the parties and have perused the record.

( 3 ) THE case of the plaintiffs is that the plaintiff-revisionists are the owners in possession of the premises No. 292/4-A situated at Tulsidas Marg, known as Victoria street, Lucknow since last over six decades. In a portion of the said premises, the revisionists reside while in a portion thereof, they are running an oil mill under the name and style of "narain Oil Mill" since the year 1945. The said firm of the revisionists was regularly assessed in the Sales Tax Department. It was having fire insurance from phoenix Assurance Co













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top