SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(All) 808

TARUN CHATTERJEE, VINEET SARAN
T. GEORGE JOSEPH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TAX registration, GOVT. OF U. P – Appellant
Versus
VIJAY KUMAR SRIVASTAVA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.VIJAYA KUMAR, SATISH CHATURVEDI

TARUN CHATTERJEE, C. J.

( 1 ) THE alleged contemnor Mr. T. George Joseph, Principal secretary, Tax Registration, Government of u. P. , Lucknow is the appellant before us. He files this appeal against an order of a learned judge exercising contempt jurisdiction in which the learned Judge after considering the allegations made in the application for contempt has framed a charge which is as follows:-that you failed to follow the directions given by the Division Bench of this court on 7-12-2000 passed in Civil Misc. Writ petition No. 38807 of 2000 and connected writ petitions in preparing the seniority list of Entertainment and Betting Tax Inspector Grade-II and thereby wilfully disobeyed the above order of this court. " after framing the charge the learned contempt Judge also directed the appellant to produce evidence in his defence of the charge by affidavit within three weeks.

( 2 ) A preliminary objection has been raised by the private-respondent saying that no appeal lies against the impugned order in view of the fact that there was no final decision of the matter. According to the learned counsel for the private-respondent, an appeal shall lie against only those order or decision




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top