JANARDAN SAHAI
VIPUL AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
ATUL KANODIA AND CO – Respondent
JANARDAN SAHAI, J.
( 1 ) AN award was made against the petitioner by the Arbitral Tribunal under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 hereinafter referred to as the Act on 17-11-1997. The petitioner filed an application to set aside the award under Section 34 of the Act. The application was dismissed by the district Judge, Kanpur Nagar by order dated 16-1-2003. The appeal against the order filed was dismissed on 7-3-2003. An application for special leave to appeal to the apex Court filed by the petitioner has been allowed and the civil appeal is now pending before the Apex Court.
( 2 ) UNDER Section 36 of the Act an arbitral award is executable as a decree. But it can be enforced only after the time for filing an application under Section 34 has expired and no application is made or such application having been made has been rejected. An application for executing the award has been filed by the respondent before the District Judge. The petitioner objected to the execution on the ground that as the appeal of the petitioner before the Supreme Court against the orders rejecting his application under Section 34 is pending the refusal of the application under Section 34 has not bec
Rachakonda Narayana v. Ponthala Parvathamma
V.M.Shah v. State of Maharashtra
Collector of Customs v. M/s Krishna Sales Pvt. Ltd.
Mithilesh Kumari v. Prem Behari Khare
India General Navigation and Railway Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen
Referred to : M/s.I.T.I.Ltd., v. Siemens Public Communication, Network Ltd.
Kunhayammed v. State of Kerala
Kerala State Electricity Board v. M. R. F. Ltd.
Jupiter Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. v. Dwarka Dhiesh Dayal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.