M.KATJU, UMESHWAR PANDEY
NATIONAL HANDLOOM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent
" (i) Whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the receivable amount of interest which has been credited by the assessee-appellant to the account, named as deferred credit interest on overdue interest bills account and debited to the account named as deferred credit interest receivable account was merely hypothetical income and not real income of the assessee-appellant and was taxable under the Income-tax Act, 1961 ? (ii) Whether, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal erred in law in appreciating and applying the correct concept of real income (either actually received or accrued), as laid down by the Supreme court in various cases to find out the taxability of the aforesaid amount under the Income-tax act, 1961 ?"
( 2 ) THESE two appeals relate to the assessment years 1990-91 and 1991-92. The facts of the case as alleged by the assessee are as follows : the assessee is a company and is a wholly owned Central Government undertaking. It has been
Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd. v. CIT
Ondal Investments Co. Ltd. v. CIT
CIT v. Hindusthan Housing and Land Development Trust Ltd.
CIT v. India Discount Co. Ltd.
Swadeshi Cotton Mill Co. Ltd. v. CIT
CIT v. Oriental Motor Car Co. (P.) Ltd.
CIT v. Roberts McLean and Co. Ltd.
CIT v. Burlop Commercial Pvt. Ltd.
REFERRED TO : State Bank of Travancore v. CIT
UCO Bank v. CIT, 1999 237 ITR 889
E.D. Sassoon and Co. Ltd. v. CIT
CIT v. Sahara Investment India Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.