SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 460

B.K.RATHI
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
SUDARSHAN LAL TALWAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT KRISHNAN, CHANDRA BHAN ISSAR, S.N.SRIVASTAVA

B. K. RATHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been preferred under S. 25 of Provincial Small Cause Courts Act against the judgment and decree for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent passed in SCC Suit No. 6 of 2001 by XIth Addl. District Judge, Kanpur Nagar on 20-8-2001.

( 2 ) THE facts in brief are as follows : the opposite party filed suit for eviction and recovery of arrears of rent. It was alleged in the plaint that the revisionists were tenant of the disputed premises No. 7/258 old and 7/213 new, Swaroop Nagar, Kanpur Nagar at rental of Rs. 15,000. 00 per month; that the premises is non-residential; that the tenancy has been terminated by notice dated 5-7-2000 which was served on revisionist No. 2 on 7-7-2000; that the premises has not been vacated hence the suit was filed.

( 3 ) THE defence taken in the written statement filed by the revisionist No. 1 through revisionist No. 2 is that the rent has been accepted after termination of the tenancy and, therefore, the notice stands waived and the tenancy is still subsisting; the locus standi of the so-called authorised attorney through Sri R. P. Gupta is also challenged.

( 4 ) IT appears that in the trial Court, point No. 2 that Sri





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top