SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 849

ASHOK BHUSHAN, S. K. SEN
SANJAI KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DY. DIRECTOR GENERAL (NCE), DIRECTORATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.L.Pandey, S.P.KESARWANI, Shabhajeet Yadav

S. K. SEN, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Special Appeal is directed against Judgment of learned Single Judge dated 11. 2. 2002 allowing the writ petition, where the learned Single Judge held that the appointment of writ petitioner having been made on compassionate ground, the same cannot be treated to be a temporary appointment and as such the order dated 5. 12. 1996 terminating his services under u. P. Temporary Government Servants (Termination of Service) Rules of 1975 is set aside.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that before passing the termination order, no show cause notice was served on the petitioner nor the petitioner was given any opportunity to explain his misconduct, if any, irregularity and unauthorised absence. It is true that if the appointment is confirmed, there cannot be simplicitor termination. On the allegation against the petitioner which has been noted by learned Single Judge in his Judgment, it was open for the respondents to have held an enquiry against the petitioner. The learned Single Judge for his decision has placed reliance on a division Bench Judgment of this Court in 1999 (2) AWC 976, Ravi Karan Singh v. State of U. P. and Ors. . The Division Bench in the aforesaid cas





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top