SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(All) 1867

G.P.MATHUR, ASHOK BHUSHAN
ANAND MOHAN SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
NIRANJAN LAL GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Arjun Singhal, MANOJ KUMAR PANDEY, Ravi Kant

ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) WE have heard Sri Ravi Kant, senior advocate appearing along with Sri Manoj Kumar Pandey for the appellant and Sri Arjun Singhal appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1.

( 2 ) BY this appeal, the appellant has challenged the judgment dated 23rd October, 2002 passed by learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 35613 of 2002. Niranjan Lal Gupta v. District magistrate, Allahabad and Anr. , allowing the writ petition filed by respondent No. 1.

( 3 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal, briefly stated, are ; father of respondent No. 1 moved an application under Section 16 (1) (b) of U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and eviction) Act, 1972, for release of accommodation of which appellant was tenant. The release application was rejected by Rent Control and Eviction Officer vide his order dated 13th January, 1987. A revision was filed against the above order which too was dismissed vide order dated 20th November, 1990. Father of respondent No. 1, late Sri Kundan Lal, filed Writ Petition No. 3351 of 1991 challenging both the orders dated 13th January, 1987 and 20th November, 1990. Kundan Lal died during pendency of the writ petition and in his plac

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top