SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 518

A. K. YOG, S. K. SEN
RAM NIHOR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANUPAM KUMAR, T.P.SINGH, VINOD SWARUP

A. K. YOG, J.


( 1 ) A short counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of all the respondents. Learned counsels for all the parties agreed that the case may be finally heard and decided at the admission stage as contemplated under Chapter XXII, Rule 2 (Second Proviso) of the Rules of the Court, 1952 (as amended upto date ).

( 2 ) HEARD learned counsels appearing for the petitioner and Sri Vinod Swaroop, Additional advocate General representing all the respondents.

( 3 ) FACTS of the case, required for decision of this petition, are not disputed.

( 4 ) RAM Nihor Singh, petitioner, is a duly enrolled Advocate on the Rolls of the Bar Council of uttar Pradesh. He is a regular legal practitioner of the District Court. He was appointed as assistant District Government Counsel (Civil) in 1978 by the State Government to conduct cases on its behalf, as is evident from the perusal of the District Magistrates letter dated October 6, 1978 (Annexure-3) to the Writ Petition ). Vide Government letter February 3, 1980. addressed to the District Magistrate. Allahabad. Annexure-4 to the writ petition. petitioner was required to take charge as District Government Counsel (Civil) as an interim measur

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top