S. K. SEN, A. K. YOG
SANDEEP CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) HEARD Sri Ajay Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri V. N. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents.
( 2 ) THIS special appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the writ petition on the ground of the maintainability of the writ petition following decision of this Court in the case of Ashok Kumar Chawla v. Central Board of Secondary Education. Shiksha Kendra. Preet Vihar. New Delhi and others, 1998 UPLBEC 370. In the aforesaid decision, the view taken by the Court was that a writ petition against a college run by a Society is not maintainable.
( 3 ) LEARNED standing counsel has, however relied upon a decision in the case of K. Krtshnamacharyulu and others v. Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering and another, air 1998 SC 295, in which the Supreme Court held that taking into consideration the claim of the employees of the said private educational institution, who were appointed on daily wages and kept in staff on non-teaching posts of Lab Assistants in the respondent private college, they should also be given on the basis of executive Instructions issued by the Government the pa
K. Krishnamacharyulu and others v. Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering and another
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.