SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 664

S. K. SEN, A. K. YOG
SANDEEP CHAUHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJAY YADAV, V.N.Upadhyay

S. K. SEN, C. J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Ajay Yadav, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri V. N. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents.

( 2 ) THIS special appeal is directed against an order passed by the learned single Judge dismissing the writ petition on the ground of the maintainability of the writ petition following decision of this Court in the case of Ashok Kumar Chawla v. Central Board of Secondary Education. Shiksha Kendra. Preet Vihar. New Delhi and others, 1998 UPLBEC 370. In the aforesaid decision, the view taken by the Court was that a writ petition against a college run by a Society is not maintainable.

( 3 ) LEARNED standing counsel has, however relied upon a decision in the case of K. Krtshnamacharyulu and others v. Sri Venkateswara Hindu College of Engineering and another, air 1998 SC 295, in which the Supreme Court held that taking into consideration the claim of the employees of the said private educational institution, who were appointed on daily wages and kept in staff on non-teaching posts of Lab Assistants in the respondent private college, they should also be given on the basis of executive Instructions issued by the Government the pa






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top