SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(All) 1009

ASHOK BHUSHAN
JOGENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, BAREILLY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N.Khare


ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.

( 1 ) HEARD counsel for the petitioners.

( 2 ) THIS writ petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for quashing of the order dated 25. 6. 2001 passed by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Barellly, order dated 15. 12. 2000 passed by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation Camp at Shahjahanpur and the order dated 25. 1. 1973 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Shahjahanpur. The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the orders passed in revision Nos. 99, 108 and 109.

( 3 ) FACTS of the case as emerge from the pleadings of the writ petition are ; the dispute relates to gata No. 41-M (15. 00, acres) of Khata No. 103 ; Gata No. 2-M (8. 50 acres) of Khata No. 262 and Gata No. 2-M (6. 25 acres) of Khata No. 41 situated in village Gahloioya, Paragana and tehsil Powayan, district Shahjahanpur. A notification under Section 4 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. (hereinafter referred to as the Forest Act) was issued by the State Government proposing the area therein to be declared as reserved forest on 27. 3. 1954. The concerned Sub-Divisional officer was appointed as forest settlement officer. Further, a notification under Section 6 of the forest Act was issued on 29.


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top