ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
N.K. Mitra, CJ., S.R. Singh, J.
MANBODH KUMAR LAL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P - Respondents
Special Appeal 709 Of 1999
Decided On : 02/01/2000
( 1 ) IN the writ petition as also in the special appeals on hand, the challenge is to the validity of the uttar Pradesh Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 27 of 1999 and the G. O. dated July 1, 1999 pursuant to which the services of the village level employees of the State Government serving in the departments referred to in the G. O. aforestated were transferred to Gram Panchayats. The learned single Judge dismissed the Writ Petition Nos. 27939 of 1999. U. P. Basic Health workers and another v. State of U. P. and others and 27937 of 1999, Smt. Shobha Sharma v. State of U. P. and others, by means of the judgment and order dated 13. 7. 1999, the correctness of which has been canvassed in the instant special appeals. Writ Petition No. 3329 of 1999 has been instituted on behalf of the U. P. Gram Panchayat Adhikari Sangh whereas Writ Petition No. 27939 of 1999 from which stemmed the Special Appeal No. 591 of 1999 was instituted on behalf of the U. P. Basic Health Workers Association and Writ Petition No. 27937 of 1999 giving rise to Special Appeal No. 709 of 1999 was instituted by appellant Smt. Shobha Sharma, claiming herself to be the President of Mahila Karamchari Sangh, Uttar Pradesh--an Association of auxiliary Nurses and Mid-wives. Since these cases are knit together by common questions of law, they are amenable to common disposal and accordingly have been taken up together for disposal by a composite order.
( 2 ) SRI Dinesh Dwivedi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant began his submission assailing the transfer of the employees under the Gram Panchayats while Sri R. P. Goel. Advocate General appearing for the State articulated his submissions in vindication of the U. P. Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1999 and the consequent transfer of services of the village level employees of the concerned departments.
( 3 ) IN order to get a hang of the controversy involved in the case, a brief sketch leading to enactment of the U. P. Panchayat Raj (Amendment) Act, 1999, is necessary. It is by seventy third Amendment made in the year 1992 that Article 243g was inserted in the Constitution, which dwells upon powers, authority, and responsibility of Panchayats. It may be abstracted below as under :
"243g. Powers, authority and responsibilities of Panchayats.--Subject to the provisions of the constitution, the Legislature of a State may, by law, endow the Panchayats with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-Government and such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon panchayats at the appropriate level, subject to such conditions as may be specified therein, with respect to (a) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice ; (b) the implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Eleventh Schedule. "
( 4 ) A glance at Article 243g would crystallise that the Legislature of a State has been ceded the power to endow the Partchayats. by law, with such powers and authority as may be necessary to enable them to function as institutions of self-Government and such law, it is further envisaged therein, may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon panchayats at the appropriate level with respect to-- (a) the preparation of plans for economic development and social justice ; and (b) the implementation of schemes for economic development and social justice as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the matters listed in the Eleventh Schedule ; health and sanitation, including hospitals, primary health centres and dispensaries ; Family Welfare ; and woman and child development, are the matters enumerated respectively at Item Nos. 23, 24 and 25 of the Eleventh Schedule of the constitution. With intent to actualising the objective engrafted in Article 243g of t
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.