SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 555

R. R. K. TRIVEDI, G. P. MATHUR, N. K. MITRA
PRABHA KAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
JOINT DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ashok Mehta, R.N.Singh

R. R. K. TRIVEDI, J.


( 1 ) IN Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 21561 of 1998, a learned Single Judge noticed contrary views expressed by two Division Benches. Consequently, he referred the matter to Honble the Chief justice by order dated 9th July, 1998 for constituting a Larger Bench to resolve the conflict. Honble the Chief Justice by order dated 23rd July, 1998 constituted this Full Bench to resolve the controversy and thus this bunch of Writ Petitions has come before us.

( 2 ) BEFORE coming to the controversy, which is subject-matter of consideration before this Full bench, it is necessary to look into the backgrounds in which the dispute has arisen.

( 3 ) PETITIONERS are teachers serving in Government aided private educational institutions. There was disparity in service conditions of the teachers serving in Government run institutions and those serving in Government aided private educational institutions. Government of India appointed Secondary Education Service Commission, which made certain recommendations for removing disparity. On basis of these recommendations. State of Uttar Pradesh initially introduced a scheme known as "triple Benefit Scheme and framed Rules known as ut






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top