SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(All) 1052

M.KATJU, O.BHATT
FORAMER – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.B.UPADHYAY, YASHWANT VERMA

M. KATJU, J.


( 1 ) THIS writ petition has been filed for a writ of certiorari for quashing the impugned notice dated november 20, 1998 (annexure 4 to the writ petition), issued under Section 148 of the Income-tax act, 1961. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged. We have heard Sri V. B. Upadh-yay, learned senior advocate, and Sri Yashwant Verma, learned counsel, for the petitioner, as well as learned departmental counsel for the respondents.

( 2 ) THIS writ petition being Writ Petition No. 181 of 1999, relates to the assessment year 1988-89, whereas connected Writ Petition No. 182 of 1999, relates to the assessment year 1989-90 and writ Petition No. 183 of 1999, relates to the assessment year 1990-91. Since the petitions are similar in nature they are being disposed of by a common judgment.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is a foreign company incorporated in France. It is engaged in the business of oil exploration and providing expertise and assistance in the said field throughout the world.

( 4 ) DURING the relevant assessment year, the petitioner-company was operating under three contracts with the Oil and Natural Gas Commission. These contracts were for drilling operation by




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top