SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 101

S.R.SINGH
SANJEEV KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
L.P.NAITHANI, Piyush Shukla, V.C.MISHRA

S. R. SINGH, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERSgrievances are focussed on orders by which their services came to be terminated as no longer required. The petitioners seek the reliefs of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the orders by which their services were terminated in purported exercise of powers under notification dated 29. 4. 1980 as no longer required and for a direction in the nature of mandamus to pay them salary.

( 2 ) PETITIONERS in this fascicle of writ petitions were appointed junior clerks/asstt. Cashiers grade-2 concerned Sub-Regional Transport Offices. The Civil Writ Petition No. 13799 of 1998 wearing the mantle of leading file, pertains to Sub-Regional Transport Offices in Meerut Region. The appointments were seemingly made in the purported compliance of the service Rules notified by Notification dated 29. 4. 80 and ostensibly against permanent vacancies after prior intimation of the vacancies to the Addl. Transport Commissioner (Head quarters) U. P. Lucknow vide D. O. letter dated 5. 7. 1997 annexed as Annexure-2 to the leading case. The Transport commissioner, U. P. Lucknow, it would appear, gave his imprimatur vide letter dated 15-7. 1997 for recruitment being made






































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top