N. K. MITRA, M. KATJU
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Special Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned single Judge dated 16. 3. 99.
( 2 ) THE grandfather of respondent No. 4 was a Government servant who died in harness and on his death, the petitioner applied for appointment under the dying-ln-harness Rules. The father of the petitioner. Lallu Ram was the only son of the petitioners grandfather Prahlad, and the petitioner was a dependant of his grandfather Prahlad and hence he applied for appointment under the dying-in-harness Rules. Admittedly the petitioners father Lallu Ram predeceased prahlad.
( 3 ) UNDER the relevant dying-in-harness Rules, a member of the family of the deceased government servant is entitled to get appointment under the dying-in-harness Rules. Rule 2 (c)of the U. P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 states :
"family" shall include the following relations of the deceased Government Servant : (i) Wife or husband ; (ii) Sons ; (iii) Unmarried and widowed daughters ;
( 4 ) LEARNED standing counsel has submitted that the respondent was not entitled to get appointment under the dying-in-harness Rules, as u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.