SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1520

N. K. MITRA, M. KATJU
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.SHUKLA, Sabha Jeet Yadav

N. K. MITRA, C. J. , M. KATJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS Special Appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of the learned single Judge dated 16. 3. 99.

( 2 ) THE grandfather of respondent No. 4 was a Government servant who died in harness and on his death, the petitioner applied for appointment under the dying-ln-harness Rules. The father of the petitioner. Lallu Ram was the only son of the petitioners grandfather Prahlad, and the petitioner was a dependant of his grandfather Prahlad and hence he applied for appointment under the dying-in-harness Rules. Admittedly the petitioners father Lallu Ram predeceased prahlad.

( 3 ) UNDER the relevant dying-in-harness Rules, a member of the family of the deceased government servant is entitled to get appointment under the dying-in-harness Rules. Rule 2 (c)of the U. P. Recruitment of Dependants of Government Servant Dying-in-Harness Rules, 1974 states :

"family" shall include the following relations of the deceased Government Servant : (i) Wife or husband ; (ii) Sons ; (iii) Unmarried and widowed daughters ;

( 4 ) LEARNED standing counsel has submitted that the respondent was not entitled to get appointment under the dying-in-harness Rules, as u













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top