SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(All) 1626

P.K.JAIN
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE – Appellant
Versus
S. M. CHOPRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.N.Verma, KRISHNA MOHAN, Shashi Nandan

P. K. JAIN, J.

( 1 ) THIS secondappeal arises out of the judgment and decree passed by the IIIrd Additional district Judge, Ghaziabad dated 3. 10. 98 dismissing the first appeal of the appellants and affirming the judgment and decree of the trial court in Suit NO. 309 of 1995.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT S. M. Chopra filed the aforesaid suit for the following substantial reliefs :

(a) That by the decree of this Honble Court it may be declared that the resignation of the plaintiff dated 11. 3. 92 being obtained by the defendants by force, under coercion and without the free consent and will of the plaintiff is illegal and voidable and is not binding on the plaintiff, and the plaintiff is continuing in services of the defendants without any effect of the said resignation letter. (b) That by the decree of mandatory injunction, the defendants be directed to deposit all the dues of the plaintiff including the arrears of salary, emoluments and allowances as well as with the amount relating to the encashment of 274 earned leaves w. e. f. 11. 3. 92 in the current account No. 49 of the plaintiff in the Lohia Nagar Branch of the defendants within the time fixed by this honble Court after calcu













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top