SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(All) 937

O.P.GARG
ASHOK KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.B.YADAV

O. P. GARG, J.


( 1 ) THE short question that arises for determination in the present petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India is whether a person who had taken birth in the family of Thakurs (Sawarns) can by virtue of his having been adopted in the family of Ahirs (backward class) be treated as belonging to the backward class and consequently entitled to the privileges. facilities and benefits available to the persons belonging to the Backward class. This question has cropped up in the backdrop of the following facts.

( 2 ) DR. Ashok Kumar. petitioner took birth on 1. 1. 1967 in the family of Thakurs. His natural father is Rushtam Singh son of Pothi Ram and the name of his natural mother is Smt. Bhagwan dei. resident of village Nalar Jamuni Bhan, Mazra Mauza Pheem Shree, Tehsil Fatehabad, district Agra. It is alleged that he was adopted by the friend of his father whose name incidentally is also Rushtam Singh son of Atar Singh belonging to Ahir caste, which admittedly is a Backward class, resident of Arsena. Tahsil Kirawali, District Agra on 25. 10. 1974, when the petitioner was aged about 8 years. A deed of adoption was also executed though it was not registered.

(

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top