SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(All) 300

V.K.KHANNA, R.A.SHARMA
BRIJ BHUSHAN GOSWAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N.DUBEY

R. A. SHARMA, J.

( 1 ) FOR the planned Industrial Development in district Mathura through the Uttar Pradesh State, Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. , Kanpur, the Government of Uttar Pradesh issued a notification dated 14-10-1988 under S. 4 read with S. 17 (4) of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). This notification was published in the U. P. Gazette Extra Ordinary of 15-10-1988 and was also published in two Daily newspapers of Hindi on 12-11-1988 and 30-11-1988. By this notification large number of plots including three plots of the petitioner were proposed to be acquired for the aforesaid purpose. As the Government was of the opinion that the provisions of S. 17 (1) of the Act were applicable to the said land, as it was required urgently for the Planned Industrial Development in district Mathura, it directed to disperse with the inquiry under S. 5a of the Act. The Government, on 1-4-1989 issued the notification under S. 6 of the Act. Thereafter notices were issued to the petitioner on 19-6-1989.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has challenged the notification dated 14-10-1988 under S. 4, notification dated 1-4-1989 under S. 6 and notices dated 19-4-1989 unde









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top